Dialogue needed to heal cultural divides
Updated: 2015-01-12 07:33
By Jin Yong(China Daily)
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
Members of Foreign Correspondents' Club of China (FCCC) gathered in a bookstore in Sanlitun, Beijing, to pay tribute to the victims of a shooting at the office of weekly satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris, on January 7, 2015. The photo shows members of FCCC holding placards reading "I am Charlie" in Chinese and French at the event. [Photo/CFP] |
The two heavily armed perpetrators of the deadly attack on the offices of Paris-based satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on Jan 7, were killed when police cornered them in northeast Paris on Friday. The two brothers, Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi, killed 12 people, eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor in their killing spree.
Of course, one has no sympathy whatsoever for the terrorists. China strongly condemned the deadly terrorist attack, said Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei, on Thursday. Yet, the tragedy also brought forward an important question for all media outlets: What on earth are the boundaries between respect for religion and freedom of the press?
The widely recognized press freedom compromises freedom of publication, communication, news gathering, and expression. It was further stressed in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, passed by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1966, that all people have the right to freely air their opinions without interference (Article 19).
Even so, all journalists should strictly abide by journalistic ethics. For devout believers, the abuse of such freedom (such as insulting religion) may cause as much damage as "killing them".
Western media such as Charlie Hebdo, have given a full play to their freedom of expression in lampooning religions or politicians. Charlie Hebdo caricatured Islam's Prophet Muhammad. Jyllands-Posten, a Danish daily, also provoked fury across the Muslim world by publishing cartoons that mocked Muhammad in 2005.
It has often seemed that some Western media publications fully enjoy their rights under the ICCPR, yet fail to bear in mind the following Article 20: "prohibition of any propaganda for war as well as any advocacy of national or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence by law ".
- Inspection teams to cover all of military in anti-corruption drive
- Tornado, heavy rain batters Central China's Hunan
- Beijing's five-year plan: Cut population, boost infrastructure
- Palace Museum discovers relics buried for over 600 years
- Disney promises ‘safe, pleasing service of high quality’
- Couple detained for selling their two sons
- Rousseff: Accusations against her 'untruthful'
- Almost one-sixth of Brazil's confirmed microcephaly cases linked to Zika
- Impeachment trial against Rousseff recommended to senate
- With nomination secured, Trump to aim all guns at Hillary Clinton
- Obama sips Flint water, urges children be tested for lead
- Massive protests against Abe mark Japan's Constitution Memorial Day
Raging wildfire spreads to more areas in west Canada
World's first rose museum to open in Beijing
Teapot craftsman makes innovation, passes down techniques
Top 8 iOS apps recommend for mothers
Five things you may not know about the Start of Summer
Art imagines celebrities as seniors
Japanese animator Miyazaki's shop a big hit in Shanghai
Star Wars Day celebrated around world
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today's Top News
Liang avoids jail in shooting death
China's finance minister addresses ratings downgrade
Duke alumni visit Chinese Embassy
Marriott unlikely to top Anbang offer for Starwood: Observers
Chinese biopharma debuts on Nasdaq
What ends Jeb Bush's White House hopes
Investigation for Nicolas's campaign
Will US-ASEAN meeting be good for region?
US Weekly
|
|
















