Healthcare's for-profit non-profit balancing act
Updated: 2015-03-11 07:36
By Zhiwu Zack Fang(China Daily)
|
|||||||||
A nurse checks the blood pressure for an old man. |
In 2009, China launched its healthcare reform, This is often considered one of the world's greatest social projects, given its broad coverage of more than 1.3 billion people and dedicated investment of over half a trillion US dollars. It has made major achievements, but there are still many challenges that need to be overcome.
The major challenge is how to balance the non-profit "mission" of the State-owned healthcare industry with the for-profit nature of the market economy. There has been a great deal of debate about whether China should turn left or turn right when implementing further healthcare reforms; yet in reality it can go straight ahead.
In healthcare, a fundamental principle is "no margin, no mission". The world shares the same mission to provide better care to more people. The world also shares the understanding that all missions have costs and rely on high productivity, efficient management and sustainable investment. Creation and distribution, these are keywords. Value or "profit" can be created in any margin driven system to ensure productivity, and value and profit can thereby be distributed as public gains if publicly owned.
To link margin with mission is not always easy. What we can learn from developed countries is the need for comprehensive legislation to cover the healthcare industry. Today, this appears more critical than ever. Healthcare reform requires a top-down design to secure its not-for-profit general mission. To make the mission achievable and sustainable, each reform must be secured by specific and comprehensive legislation that ensures nobody can change the mission during its execution. Stable execution, instead of uncertain or fast-changing regulation, is necessary to attract the participation of active market players.
Major legislated reform is needed for the medical insurance sector in China, in order to encourage participation and investment from major commercial insurance companies. At present, the legislation is insufficient with regard to claim adjudication, risk adjustment, shared savings, and payment management. Without strengthening the legislation, most insurance companies will continue to consider healthcare an uncertain market and fear to make significant investments in technology, human resources and advanced products. As a result, the Stated-owned social benefit system is left with limited adjudication capability and massive abuse, and thus the threat of overdraws.
- Global health entering new era: WHO chief
- Brazil's planning minister steps aside after recordings revelation
- Vietnam, US adopt joint statement on advancing comprehensive partnership
- European border closures 'inhumane': UN refugee agency
- Japan's foreign minister calls A-bombings extremely regrettable
- Fukushima impact unprecedented for oceans: US expert
- Stars of Lijiang River: Elderly brothers with white beards
- Wealthy Chinese children paying money to learn British manners
- Military-style wedding: Fighter jets, grooms in dashing uniforms
- Striking photos around the world: May 16 - May 22
- Robots help elderly in nursing home in east China
- Hanging in the air: Chongqing holds rescue drill
- 2.1-ton tofu finishes in two hours in central China
- Six things you may not know about Grain Buds
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Anti-graft campaign targets poverty relief |
Cherry blossom signal arrival of spring |
In pictures: Destroying fake and shoddy products |
China's southernmost city to plant 500,000 trees |
Cavers make rare finds in Guangxi expedition |
Cutting hair for Longtaitou Festival |
Today's Top News
Liang avoids jail in shooting death
China's finance minister addresses ratings downgrade
Duke alumni visit Chinese Embassy
Marriott unlikely to top Anbang offer for Starwood: Observers
Chinese biopharma debuts on Nasdaq
What ends Jeb Bush's White House hopes
Investigation for Nicolas's campaign
Will US-ASEAN meeting be good for region?
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |