US troops may leave if no deal in Afghanistan
Updated: 2013-11-26 15:00
(Agencies)
|
||||||||
A member of the Loya Jirga, grand council, leaves on the last day of the Loya Jirga, in Kabul Nov 24, 2013. [Photo/Agencies] |
KABUL/WASHINGTON - Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai has refused to sign a security deal with the United States, the White House said, opening up the prospect of a complete withdrawal of US troops from the strife-torn nation next year.
Karzai told US National Security Advisor Susan Rice in Kabul on Monday that the United States must put an immediate end to military raids on Afghan homes and demonstrate its commitment to peace talks before he would sign a bilateral security pact, Karzai's spokesman said.
The White House said Karzai had outlined new conditions in the meeting with Rice and "indicated he is not prepared to sign the (bilateral security agreement) promptly."
"Without a prompt signature, the US would have no choice but to initiate planning for a post-2014 future in which there would be no US or NATO troop presence in Afghanistan," a White House statement quoted Rice as saying.
The complete withdrawal, called the "zero option", would be similar to the pull-out of US troops from Iraq two years ago.
On Sunday, an assembly of Afghan elders endorsed the security pact, but Karzai suggested he might not sign it until after national elections next spring.
The impasse strengthens questions about whether any US and NATO troops will remain after the end of next year in Afghanistan, which faces a still-potent insurgency waged by Taliban militants and is still training its own military.
US troops have been in Afghanistan since leading multinational forces in ousting the Taliban regime in late 2001.
Just over two years ago, US President Barack Obama pulled the plug on talks with Iraq about keeping a residual American force there after that war. In October 2011, when he announced that decision, there were more than 40,000 troops in the country. By the end of the year, they had all been withdrawn.
In Afghanistan, there are still 47,000 American forces. The United States has been in discussions with Afghan officials about keeping a small residual force of about 8,000 troops there after it winds down operations next year.
US officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, have said the bilateral security deal with Afghanistan must be signed by year-end to begin preparations for a post-2014 presence.
Rice, who made a three-day visit to Afghanistan to visit US troops, told Karzai it was "not viable" to defer signing the deal until after the election, the White House said.
The delay "would not provide the United States and NATO allies the clarity necessary to plan for a potential post-2014 military presence," the White House said.
- Focus on China-Africa research
- In photos: NE China blanketed by heavy snow
- Kennedy visits Japan's disaster areas
- Volcano eruption leads evacuation in Indonesia
- Nuclear power 'to fall short of demand'
- Experts doubt smog linked to low birthrate
- Residents near pipeline blast demand relocation
- Doggy, please be my ears and listen for me
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Going for 100,000 |
The way of kindness |
Intl attention on reform agenda for China |
A second opportunity |
Luxury giants tap into mainland market |
Aiming for 100,000 |
Today's Top News
China pursues a 'balanced and active' European policy
Trimble helping China grow
Gallup poll a bit hazy over air quality satisfaction
More Americans say Obama can't manage govt
China, Romania seal deals
Obama heckled in Chinatown
Kennedy visits disaster areas
Rules on investment eased
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |