US judge upholds NSA phone surveillance program
Updated: 2013-12-28 01:23
(Agencies)
|
|||||||||
NEW YORK - A US judge ruled the National Security Agency's program that collects records of millions of Americans' phone calls is lawful, rejecting a challenge by the American Civil Liberties Union to the controversial counter-terrorism program.
Friday's decision by USDistrict Judge William Pauley in Manhattan diverges from a December 16 ruling by USDistrict Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., who said the "almost Orwellian" program was likely unconstitutional.
The program's existence had first been disclosed by Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor whose leaks have detailed the breadth of USelectronic surveillance and sparked a debate over how much leeway to give the government in protecting Americans from terrorism.
In a 54-page decision, Pauley said the program "vacuums up information about virtually every telephone call to, from, or within the United States."
But he said the program's constitutionality "is ultimately a question of reasonableness," and that there was no evidence that the government had used "bulk telephony metadata" for any reason other than to investigate and disrupt terrorist attacks.
"Technology allowed al Qaeda to operate decentralized and plot international terrorist attacks remotely," Pauley wrote. "The bulk telephony metadata collection program represents the government's counter-punch."
The judge denied the ACLU's motion for a preliminary injunction and granted a government motion to dismiss the case.
President Barack Obama has defended the surveillance program, but indicated a willingness to consider constraints.
The ACLU had no immediate comment. The White House was not immediately available for comment. A USDepartment of Justice spokesman said the department is pleased with the decision.
Rep. Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterintelligence & Terrorism, in a statement said Pauley's decision "preserves a vital weapon for the United States in our war against international terrorism."
The case is American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Clapper et al, USDistrict Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-03994.
- F1 legend Schumacher in coma after ski accident
- Net result
- Fire on express train in India kills at least 26
- Times Square visitors purge bad memories
- Ice storm leaves many without power in US, Canada
- 'Chunyun' train tickets up for sale
- Abe's war shrine visit sparks protest
- LeBron James is AP's Male Athlete of the Year
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
In memory of unnamed heroes |
The new temples of a twilight age |
Door opens on system for official residences |
Restoring a link to their heritage |
Top universities face exams for corruption |
Taking a humane look at cosmetics |
Today's Top News
German magazine reveals NSA hacking tactics
Auto industry rolls through ’13 for China, US
Outrage still festers over Abe shrine visit
Suicide bomber kills 16 at Russian train station
Li says economy stable in 2014
Bigger role considered in the Arctic
3rd high-level official probed
Abe stepping up military agenda
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |