Experts believe the latest report about previous overestimation of China's carbon emissions will not affect the Chinese government's environmental policy and its stance in the upcoming United Nations Climate Conference in Paris in December.

A study published on Wednesday by Nature said international organizations could be overestimating emissions from China, the world's biggest producer of greenhouse gas because of problems in the way they calculate their data.

The paper said organizations like the European Union's Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) have overestimated China's emissions by as much as 14 percent by using default conversion rates that should not apply in China.

Ranping Song, a team leader for the China Climate Program at the World Resources Institute, believes the adjustment in data will not have a fundamental effect on Chinese government policy or the conference in Paris, which aims to conclude a legally binding and universal agreement on climate.

"The main reason is that we believe that many of the climate actions China has been taking are due to the needs of the new development model, or known as the new normal that would require carbon reductions," Song told China Daily on Thursday, adding that the Chinese have realized the harmful consequence of air pollution.

Because of these factors, Song believes that the change of statistics will not have a major impact on China's strategy and stance, including the joint announcement in Beijing last November by Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Barack Obama in which China promised to peak its carbon emissions by 2030 or earlier.

Song noted that the Chinese government departments have been improving their data collecting system to make their statistics more accurate. But he noted that the less than frequent announcement of the data by the Chinese government means that many have turned to figures from other sources, such as International Energy Agency or BP. The last carbon emission figures provided by the Chinese government were for the year 2005.

While the study might ease some of the pressure on China, it still has a lot to do to rein in its spiraling greenhouse gas emissions, said Dabo Guan, chair of Climate Change Economics at the University of East Anglia, and one of the authors of the Nature study.

"Our estimates, which use a lower emission factor, don't change the fact that China is still the largest emitter in the world," he said.

"This will give some carbon space for the less-developed regions in China but it is not a game-changer. It won't disrupt China's mitigation efforts."

While there is no official figure for Chinese carbon emissions last year, estimates stand at around 9-10 billion tonnes, while forecasts for 2030 range anywhere between 11 billion and 20 billion tonnes, according to a Reuters report.

"Without an accurate baseline, any target will become a number-crunching game," Guan said.

"The main difference in our paper is for the first time we have taken fuel quality into consideration, which is missing from other estimates," said Guan.

Taking into account China's lower quality coal, the study calculated China's 2013 carbon emissions at 9.13 billion tonnes, below the EDGAR figure and 5.6 percent lower than an estimate in oil major BP's statistical yearbook.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommends a default "emission factor" of 0.713 tonnes of carbon for every tonne of coal produced, but the Nature authors, looking at around 600 samples from domestic mines, said the figure in China should be closer to 0.518 tones.

(China Daily USA 08/21/2015 page1)