Australian court rejects law allowing gay marriage
Updated: 2013-12-12 10:34
(Agencies)
|
|||||||||
SYDNEY - Australia's highest court struck down a landmark law on Thursday that had begun allowing the country's first gay marriages just days ago, shattering the dreams of more than two dozen same-sex newlyweds whose marriages will now be annulled less than a week after their weddings.
The federal government had challenged the validity of the Australian Capital Territory's law that had allowed gay marriage in the nation's capital and its surrounding area starting last Saturday.
The federal government's lawyer had argued that having different marriage laws in various Australian states and territories would create confusion. The ACT, which passed the law in October, said it should stand because it governs couples outside the federal definition of marriage as being between members of the opposite sex.
The High Court unanimously ruled that the ACT's law could not operate concurrently with the federal Marriage Act, which was amended in 2004 to define marriage as between a man and a woman.
"The Marriage Act does not now provide for the formation or recognition of marriage between same sex couples. The Marriage Act provides that a marriage can be solemnised in Australia only between a man and a woman," the court said in a statement issued alongside its ruling. ``That Act is a comprehensive and exhaustive statement of the law of marriage."
Rodney Croome, national director of the advocacy group Australian Marriage Equality, said his group knows of about 30 same-sex couples who have married since Saturday, though the actual number may be slightly higher. The ruling means their marriages are now nullified.
The ruling comes a day after India's Supreme Court struck down a 2009 lower court decision to decriminalize homosexuality, dealing a blow to gay activists who have fought for years for the chance to live openly in India's deeply conservative society.
Gay marriage has legal recognition in 18 countries as well as 16 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia.
The federal government had challenged the validity of the Australian Capital Territory's law that had allowed gay marriage in the nation's capital and its surrounding area starting last Saturday.
The federal government's lawyer had argued that having different marriage laws in various Australian states and territories would create confusion. The ACT, which passed the law in October, said it should stand because it governs couples outside the federal definition of marriage as being between members of the opposite sex.
The High Court unanimously ruled that the ACT's law could not operate concurrently with the federal Marriage Act, which was amended in 2004 to define marriage as between a man and a woman.
"The Marriage Act does not now provide for the formation or recognition of marriage between same sex couples. The Marriage Act provides that a marriage can be solemnised in Australia only between a man and a woman," the court said in a statement issued alongside its ruling. ``That Act is a comprehensive and exhaustive statement of the law of marriage."
Rodney Croome, national director of the advocacy group Australian Marriage Equality, said his group knows of about 30 same-sex couples who have married since Saturday, though the actual number may be slightly higher. The ruling means their marriages are now nullified.
The ruling comes a day after India's Supreme Court struck down a 2009 lower court decision to decriminalize homosexuality, dealing a blow to gay activists who have fought for years for the chance to live openly in India's deeply conservative society.
Gay marriage has legal recognition in 18 countries as well as 16 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia.
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Logging out of an Internet addiction |
Prepare prisoners for life after release |
'Can we survive after surviving?' |
Cities hit hard by smog |
$50,000 in the US; $149,000 in China |
Against a sea of troubles |
Today's Top News
Foreigners stay cool to insurance
China responds to EU's resolution on organ harvesting
DPRK's Jang Song-thaek sentenced to death
Chinese Fulbrights 'internationalize' campuses
Sinopec's front woman in the US
Slowdown seen in petroleum use
Apple sends in experts to probe employees' deaths
China,US consider the other side a rival
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |